The Affordable Care Act Celebrates its Second Birthday at The Supreme Court

Last week, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) celebrated its second anniversary, and today, the Supreme Court will take up arguments brought by states questioning whether the Federal Government has the right to require individuals to purchase health insurance policies.  The key issue is whether this mandate is justified by the Commerce Clause of the Constitution, as the Administration argues.

Ironically, the individual mandate itself is an idea that stems from a 1989 report from the conservative Heritage Foundation.  In that report, Stuart Butler (Heritage’s health care expert at the time) argued that under the “Heritage Plan” a mandate was necessary because “[s]ociety does feel a moral obligation to insure that its citizens do not suffer from the unavailability of health care. But on the other hand, each household has the obligation, to the extent it is able, to avoid placing demands on society by protecting itself… A mandate on households certainly would force those with adequate means to obtain insurance protection.”  This was, of course, a central element of Mitt Romney’s Massachusetts plan as well as his 2008 defense of this plan; in the 2008 ABC News debate, Governor Romney stated, “Here’s my view: If somebody – if somebody can afford insurance and decides not to buy it, and then they get sick, they ought to pay their own way, as opposed to expect the government to pay their way….And that’s an American principle. That’s a principle of personal responsibility.”

To assist with the complexity of this issue, we have posted a series of videos below from the Alliance for Health Care Reform.  The Alliance for Health Care Reform, is a nonpartisan, nonprofit group, that according to its mission statement, “does not lobby or take positions on legislation.”  In their statement accompanying the release of the videos to coincide with the second anniversary of the Affordable Care Act, the Alliance for Health Care Reform wrote something near and dear to TheFactFile.com (emphasis added), “Although the Affordable Care Act is two years old today, it’s obvious that millions of Americans don’t understand it. This is a bipartisan problem. So, believing that people should argue about policy but not facts, [The Alliance for Health Care Reform created] videos to help…explain…how the law affects” young adults, small employers, people on Medicare or Medicaid, uninsured with pre-existing conditions and primary care providers.  TheFactFile.com found these videos extremely informative and we hope our readers will as well.

YOUNG ADULTS (3:01)
featuring Sara Collins, vice president for the Affordable Health Insurance Program at The Commonwealth Fund

SMALL EMPLOYERS (3:40)
 featuring Terry Gardiner, vice president for policy and strategy at Small Business Majority

PEOPLE ON MEDICARE (3:04)
 featuring John Rother, president of the National Coalition on Health Care

PEOPLE ON MEDICAID (2:44)
 
featuring Diane Rowland, executive vice president of the Kaiser Family Foundation

UNINSURED PEOPLE WITH PRE-EXISTING CONDITIONS (2:44)
 
featuring Deborah Chollet, senior fellow at Mathematica Policy Research

PRIMARY CARE PROVIDERS (3:02) featuring Kevin Grumbach, MD, professor and chair of the Dept. of Family and Community Medicine at the Univ. of California, San Francisco

Spending in the 2012 Elections: Who is getting the Most Value for Their Campaign Dollars? – March 7 Update

With Super Tuesday now behind us, we wanted to return once again to the question of how much each active candidate has spent per delegate earned. As of our last update, Ron Paul was still dominating as the candidate getting the least number of delegates per dollar spent, paying around $1.8 million per delegate compared to the runner-up Gingrich’s $941,000. But have things changed after Tuesday’s primaries?

The following chart compares the four GOP candidates on the total amount of money raised/spent as of February 31, 2012. (Unfortunately, newer numbers are not available at this time). These figures include revenues/expenditures by the campaigns and the Super PACs that support the campaigns. The delegate count comes from here (accessed 3/7/12).

Candidate Money Raised Money Spent Delegates Overall Cost per Delegate
Newt Gingrich $31,500,000 $27,300,000 105 $260,000
Ron Paul $34,700,000 $32,800,000 47 $697,872
Mitt Romney $100,400,000 $63,900,000 415 $153,976
Rick Santorum $9,700,000 $7,600,000 176 $43,182

The bad news for the Paul campaign is that their candidate is still at the top of the list in terms of spending the most and getting the least. The good news, however, is that things are getting better: on February 1, each delegate cost Paul around $3 million, compared to ‘only’ $697,823 today. And once again, the Santorum campaign — at $43,182 per delegate — is gaining the most amount of delegates for the least amount of money.

We’ll continue monitoring this race for #1, and, as always, we’re interested in what you have to say: Join the discussion below or let us know via Facebook or Twitter.

 

Election 2012: Delegate Count Update

The latest round of GOP primary battles took place yesterday, with Arizona and Michigan both going to Mitt Romney. In the case of Arizona, the state’s winner-takes-all system means that Romney secured all 29 delegates. In contrast, the rules in Michigan dictate that two delegates be awarded to the winner of each of the state’s 14 congressional districts, and another two going to the winner of the statewide vote. As a result, despite Romney’s “victory”, the end result is a draw with both Romney and Santorum ending up with 11 delegates.

Given the fluidity of the race to 1,144 delegates (the number needed to win the nomination), we decided to keep a running tab on how many delegates each candidate has secured. We’ll update the chart as new statewide results come in.

Source: Associated Press